The language in the housing report was that Stows laws were prohibitive of rental housing unless it is a 40B development, so there are a couple 40B developments  that solve the affordable problem, but there is still zero rental properties for those with higher income that rent. 

The federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the federal Fair Housing Act Amendments Act of 1988 prohibit discrimination on the basis of the following criteria (called “protected categories”): race or color; religion; national origin; familial status or age—includes families with children under the age of 18 and pregnant women; disability or handicap, or sex.

I'll definitely come check you guys out at the next meet up, however I'm not so sure about investing here in Hawaii, just assuming the entry price is prohibitive and if I'm leaving island it might be more of a headache dealing with overseas, but nothing is out of the question.

To avoid prohibited transactions entirely, it's probably best to look for a completely separate rental property that you and your wife will not have any personal involvement in.

Any direct or indirect transaction between his IRA and such a disqualified party would result in a self-dealing prohibited transaction for his IRA with severe tax consequences.Your father's IRA could be used to form a new real estate development business using a Rollover as Business Startup program.  

Even the CAR rules (which are not law) don't prohibit your own sales.

Witness what they are doing to vehicle dealers which the Dodd-Frank Act specifically prohibited them from getting involved in.

I like the prohibition on commercial vehicles, boats, RV's, etc. cluttering the place up.

Prohibited in all states is the refusal to rent because of ethnic background, race, religion, sex, sexual proclivity, age, marital status, or income source. 

(I am wondering if sending from my own account somehow makes it a prohibited transaction.)Anyone have any good advice about how to resolve this cleanly?