Over the past three years, I’ve been using most of the major off-market techniques.One standout method has always been pulling data and feeding it into a call center to generate off-market leads.

For instance, if three of my properties are generating significant cash flow and performing well, they can offset any issues that may arise with another property, such as a heating system failure.

I would suggest establishing teams in both markets and evaluating which one generates leads that align with your investment criteria.

This works well for wholesalers who sell deals to flippers, and flippers or investors can benefit even more by going the extra mile to generate their own off-market leads.

Many cities have high overhead costs that consume a large portion of generated revenue.

Cash Flow: If your rentals are generating solid cash flow, you could keep using that money to build reserves, reinvest in more properties, or improve your existing ones.

I do notice that the annualized return generated by BP is usually quite a bit lower given the same inputs.  

The cost segregation study generated $80k in passive losses, meaning a portion of that would be recaptured as ordinary income (at a 25% federal rate).

Many in the building industry had hoped the next generation of flippers would embrace building performance & remediate the ever aging poorly performing housing stock.

But my rental is not generating any cash flow in fact I have to pay for tax and HOA out of my own pocket.