I would suggest not using wifi cams.

We were presented with an LOI that was severely lacking in features in terms of buyer's contingencies, rent/CAM abatement credits, etc.

This is a great question; there's the general tenant screening (full spectrum of reporting which can typically include Criminal Reports/Background Check, Residence History/Eviction History, Employment Verification, Sex Offender List, Credit History, etc), but definitely an interesting thought with regard to pulling an interested applicant's social media history.Social media can be tricky because verification of account ownership can be a hard one to pin down; ie. if you require it as part of your application, a tenant can supply a "clean" version of their social media presence (ie. professionally created social media profile) versus an account that the applicant might actually use regularly, but you may not have any type of verifiable information to confirm that they own/operate the account.

If they have anti-social disorder, especially if they have committed sex-offences no one wants them, and they might have other felonies as well.The non-crazy SSDI recipients fare better; they can get along with a room-mate and since they are more sympathetic, they'll probably have better luck finding subsidized housing. 

Some jurisdictions forbid minor children from sharing a room with those of opposite sex.

I cam here to make a comment and to plug my knowledge but instead, I learned something from @Andrew Postell and @Tim Miller@Trush A.

What if you seller is the opposite sex?

s (you can guess the acronym.Funny you mentioned cameras, I just installed my first two nest cam's, they're great!

What the hell does that mean you sex monkey you?"

I’m just confused because if I charge them CAM quarterly based on actual figures, what would be the point of the reconciliation?