data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81352/81352796780110322e7d5a6a0c01cc7e253c187a" alt=""
30 December 2015 | 41 replies
FYI, people allegedly violating any FL licensing laws will find their name on www.myfloridalicense.com.
7 March 2019 | 16 replies
He didn't lease it, and a few months later I saw headlines he had allegedly defrauded thousands of fans.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e2c/08e2c744a94f1476b91862c57fbcd3e7ba4b4e9f" alt=""
7 August 2015 | 51 replies
They would have gotten I.D. from the alleged buyers and found out who the lazy realtor was.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf0a/bdf0ac345eed7d64b9f3094d4e91af90e9c46747" alt=""
28 August 2011 | 2 replies
You find he is at the rental property each time you go by, but the girlfriend says he is "just visiting" but does not live there.At what point does he turn from "visitor" (simply her boyfriend who visits --a lot-- and who [allegedly] only sleeps over "occasionally" [ha!])
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76abb/76abb283bbedf3428b32077421f790ed3b52bb68" alt=""
8 April 2009 | 5 replies
:) Considering what you and I have been talking about recently, Josh, this IS interesting.What surprises me the most is not that they're alleging trademark infringement so much as the very bizarre way of describing the infringement.There must be something more to it (at least, for their legal counsel's sake, I HOPE there's something more to it.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2fde/d2fdef14aa144972bfe398cd623a735b1dd473a1" alt=""
6 August 2015 | 5 replies
I don't know why they would include "stats" from 05-06 in an article about what is allegedly happening in the market today unless they are just looking for stats that match what they are trying to portray.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3c43/e3c43c2632e0ceffea4993ab753c013f67f17bb4" alt=""
28 May 2015 | 5 replies
Remember you insure against allegations of not that you actually did it, as an intentional act is always excluded on liability, but if you unintentionally cross that fair lending practice line, you will want that coverage, at least for legal defense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5f5b/f5f5b5f811e23e11fbe4b695c9461a175576fe9b" alt=""
20 December 2013 | 26 replies
(Of course not the truth, but the allegations you may hear if you keep posting!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6abf0/6abf0706477624756652bbb13b06c3c477c2be61" alt=""
5 January 2014 | 28 replies
If the facts alleged by the plaintiff can't be sustained, the state of the corporate entity is moot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/033f2/033f2f5d0059d3d960a96d2f975121ca13e54cff" alt=""
15 January 2018 | 2 replies
If you file a quiet title lawsuit against the taxpayer 3.5 years after the tax deed, you will win if the taxpayer counterclaims and alleges the tax sale was void if:You can prove you were in exclusive possession of the property during the most recent three years after the tax deed date; andAny evidence by the taxpayer that it was ALSO in intermittent possession of the property does not rise to the legal standard of scrambling possession.It's a little bit complicated to explain all the examples of #2.