@David Oldenburg It's truly amazing how you were able to turn a pretty undesirable property to something so modern and expensive-looking without having to break the bank. 

Currently my way of getting rid of slightly undesired tenants is to raise the rent above market. 

Again tenant quality is going to better with respect to cost of living.Yes very good points about tenant qualityNo war zones in Australia, but certainly higher crime/ undesirable neighborhoodsDefine savages??

This product is intended to go after the undesirable green stuff while avoiding putting a hurting on the good green stuff.

Just wanted to do a preliminary one myself before I paid for one just in case I decide to cancel a contract due to something like a major lien or even an error on my part (such as repair estimate) that might make the deal undesirable to an investor.

just wanted to get some other than my own insight on warzones. what makes them so undesirable to most investors. i think they are gold mines that are misunderstood and waiting to be tapped. a lot of buildings in war zones i notice end up becoming a city burden when the original owner can't afford the building anymore.

Assuming there are only 3 categories:Class A would be Upper Arlington, Dublin, etc - extremely desirable by allClass C would be the Bottoms, South Linden, Driving Park, etc - undesirable, lots of crimeClass B is somewhere in the middle.

I realize this question is only peripherally related to real estate.  

Shreveport can go from desirable to undesirable in the space of two blocks.  

So they move to undesirable areas and, because they are artists, make those areas pretty - they don't litter, whatever car they have will be well maintained, they are more inclined to call 911 than previous residents, and other things like that that aren't necessarily characteristic of non-artist lower income persons (yes this theory is rank with implicit stereotypes).