@Matthew Kwan, he is asking why the underwriters will not allow him to use the proposed rental income from the subject property at time of purchase.

Sorry to be so negative, just wanted to point out some of the drawbacks of what you are proposing, I hope it is at least a little helpful.

The Democratic bill proposed seems to offer funding to landlords while the Republican bills offers landlords nothing. 

As for Marketing, I've never seen an agent propose a marketing plan with market segmentation, value proposition, buyer profiling, market analysis, or any of the MBA type stuff. 

When going before public meetings with your proposals, drug, alcohol, and half way houses for former incarcerated, receive the most scrutiny.

My agent said it wasn't worth challenging because Nationwide is leaving the state.Our insur. agency sent a new proposal from Bass insur.

If you like I can send you a proposal for finishing up your build to see where I’m at to see if it still makes sense

You prob just need "existing and proposed" plans that show the floor plan of the home=existing (an architect can do this for prob 2-3k) and then the system IN the cabin=proposed.

So, to no surprise, CA is doing exactly none of your private property taking schemes John. https://www.gov.ca.gov/2025/01/13/governor-newsom-proposes-b...CA is doing the only viable option they have, fast tracking reconstruction of what was.

SEEKING feedback from other Sellers of rental or primary residence homes who have dealt with SINGH Development Company agreeing to Seller Carryback Finance terms and "the end result" from beginning to end of contract terms.The proposed offer is for 7 years, $600 monthly payment to Seller, balance due at end of 7 years, 0% interest as final overall price paid to Seller after 7 years from date of closing is inflated to $270,000.