That would go in front of a judge and the person with the most evidence or most convincing story will win.

Should I be sued I feel like an attorney would be able to craft an argument that would convince a judge to let them "pierce the corporate veil" and open up exposure to all of my properties. 

Insurance would cover it, I would pay the deductible, and no assets would be lost.If you are in an area like San Diego where people are more likely to sue, a judge is more likely to find you guilty, and the payout is expected to be higher, you may consider an umbrella insurance policy.

I looked into her and see that she takes it upon herself to be judge and jury on "scammers" (everything she posts on the local groups is to tell people of scam posts...many actually are).  

Unless you're ready to pack it in when your first renter points out that you were slow to respond to an issue or missed the mark in some other small way, you need to ask yourself why Morris Invest should be judged only on the petty and relatively insignificant issues that some have cited throughout this thread rather than on the fact that the end result is a happy client getting the benefit of the promised cash-flowing property.

If you take lessons from The Hands-Off Investor and many people here, you want to judge the operator first and do your due diligence on them.

Excuses don't count and the judge will find in your favor.

Why would I not choose to leverage at 6 or 7% (my current lock is at 6.385%)https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/san-diego/real-estatemy long time stance that the RE should be judged on total return use to be very unpopular view on this site that viewed cash flow as sure and superior and appreciation to be gambling.  

You can judge the ethics of that request yourself to put into these rock-solid businesses above. 

Judging from your profile photo, you have at least 1 good reason to take the entrepreneurial leap.Wishing you the best as you go from corporate office to REI.