data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8f98/d8f986e60fe922b74fa70da050819f8a287d075d" alt=""
12 February 2020 | 15 replies
@Asa Ifill talk to Joel Jaqubino at Bold Title
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41be9/41be9b4accd9fb135172c089d3ccc1b77926c474" alt=""
5 February 2020 | 8 replies
In the other, the Debtor has an attorney, requested an extension, and we'll see if she files her docs.Just seems like severely delinquent borrowers are more bold and taking more aggressive actions to stop sales.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bbc2/3bbc262fae8f024dfaf5b7cc742dabccd0951020" alt=""
14 June 2021 | 20 replies
Thanks for reaching out.Sameer, you strike me as a life coach of some flavor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03ce7/03ce75fb633a1625e8badcee7ce7e4ce0426f89f" alt=""
11 February 2020 | 7 replies
I think it would be a big uphill battle to convince a judge of that, but it is not out of the realm of possibility.Looking up the legal requirements for Unjust Enrichment:1) Must have provided something of value while expecting compensation in return. 2) Other party must have acknowledged, accepted, and benefited from whatever was provided. 3) Must show that it would be inequitable or unconscionable for the other party to enjoy the benefit of your actions without paying for it.Gut feeling is that she will fail on the two bolded parts: She never expected to be compensated; And she took a garage door that she had trouble opening/closing and made it easier for herself.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aee9f/aee9f4798fd39761a5a8648a0c2abd35648f68b2" alt=""
14 February 2020 | 11 replies
Her bank does her no favors by printing "payment enclosed" in bold on the outside of the envelope.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/846fe/846fe2a81669416e31d7e01efb92ce0ab8b47235" alt=""
17 February 2020 | 8 replies
It should say it in a bold title right at the top.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9f7e/a9f7ea7fa4f4f717d3ad9ee09a7dc098b1b95bfc" alt=""
12 October 2020 | 10 replies
.- 30 day min rentals (the deal breaker)- In person check-ins (additional expense or at minimum a time investment)- Noise monitoring devices required (a small expense, but this one I agree with)- Max heads in beds (although reasonable at 2 adults per room)- Posting a contact number in bold for the public to see (100% need to pay for cameras and an alarm if this one passes, that sign might as well read "rob this house").I'm all for regulation, I just hope they don't "government the crap outta this" and in an attempt to control isolated incidents, make a system overly complicated and expensive, therefore no longer profitable to the small guy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8319/d8319bf990f8f755e5407978c622272c5f6563e7" alt=""
19 May 2021 | 9 replies
I always used to ask for last 12 months of meeting minutes to get a flavor for discussions + financials to see reserves and budgets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a99c/1a99cd964edf7999cc03862f68d835146cdc7f59" alt=""
26 February 2020 | 10 replies
All in all I’m just kind of lost on where/when to start..I guess my main questions would be:Is starting with multifamily too bold?