The law requires you to act reasonably, the absence of which is just...negligence.The civil justice system tries to be fair, but from a practical standpoint, but when it comes to real estate investors/landlords v. consumers cases, the REI starts out in a hole. 

@Tom Braddy you would really need to consult an attorny that specializes in civil contract law.

You almost never recoup costs lost.This is a contract dispute, and you will most likely be paying the attorney up-front for prep, plus additional litigation fees.

It is a grey area with many gotchas and a long history of litigation between taxpayers and the IRS.

They are ruining his business and scaring the good tenants .let’s be realistic The police are not going to get involved in a civil matter over a lease agreement or tenancy like this unless there’s some form of assault .

You need to spend $10s of thousands if not $100s on drawings elevations civil engineers planners before you pay the plan submission fees to get in the door and they can say no or you need to make amendments that cost more $$$

It's illegal to lie about investment products in the civilized world down under :-)

Retirement accounts are usually shielded from litigation, bankruptcy and divorce.

In other words, if the light with the glow ring is discontinued, or now costs 500% more than it used to, it would be unreasonable for you to replace like with like because the primary function of the object is the mirror and the light, not the glow ring, and no court would find in the tenant's favor if it were litigated (no one is going to litigate over a mirror). 

I’ve gotten mixed reviews on the civil/criminal implications involved with this deal gone wrong as well as who professionally is responsible.