While its my favorite time of year, the storms can be quite volatile which will require a much more frequent cleaning schedule.

Beyond that they are hard to get good cash flow on and tend to be a more volatile investment than SFH.

It reduces your risk of a volatile market but it also is an opportunity cost.

I don’t have to worry about furnishing, utilities or volatility of income (great for cold weather climates like MSP).

You can look at graphs of San Francisco pricing and it has been wildly volatile over time.

It lists median rent growth, population growth, job growth, median household income growth, unit construction, and persons-per-unit change over the periods 2012-2017 and 2005-2017.Because smaller markets (less than 500,000 people) tend to be more volatile than larger markets, I also include each MSA's volatility as represented by the standard deviation of each metrics.

I don't even invest in B areas because cash flow is lower and volatility is higher (I'm trying to avoid equity loss during a crash).

For those of you in this market, is this normal return on these small, sfh or is this market just that volatile and change dramatically from street to street/neighborhood.I am just wondering, as I am aware certain markets like IN and OH tend to give much better rental returns than other markets, but don't hear much about markets in Southeast meeting that criteria very often.

They have a little higher gains (a lot more volatility) but a syndicator who is willing to put you in a deal with more than 10-20% of your net worth is asking for trouble.

Comes down to vetting the opportunity and the sponsor and trusting them with what they are doing and their comprehension of the asset class, market and plans in case of some market volatility.