Thanks for your thoughts @David Barnett  What concerns me,  is big brother gubrmnt is gonna get involved quickly with this(In Boise some of this is going on already) and harm ALL landlords and in the end tenants.

Your statement does more harm than good.Unfortunately, your statement is blatantly wrong.

Given the impact rent control can have on new investments and investor interests, is it a necessary "evil" to protect the interests of the current renter base or is it causing more harm then good?

Or websites that detail the property like if most of it is uninhabitable, flood zones, protected wildlife, etc?

No harm in that.

In some areas, they allow you to build your first floor above the flood level but then have to allow for water to flow freely under the structure.The openings should still have grates over them to prevent wildlife from taking up residence underneath.  

I felt they would argue a lesser period of time wouldnt allow them the time needed to find a place and I didn't want to create additional conflict in fear they would harm our property.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

It doesn't sound to me like you're a professional property manager anyway - you just look after your own units - and unless you think there's a chance your friend might file a complaint against you, I really don't see the harm if it's one unit.

In case of a multi-member LLC, showing that another member would be harmed by the forclosure may help to avoid this judgment.