My philosophy is that the PARENTS and not the Government, should control the health care for their children.

I agree with the philosophy that a wise person is the one who surrounds himself with (and listens to those) who know more than he/she and there should be no shame in asking questions to acquire useful knowledge.I'm here to learn, help myself, my family, my friends, and help each of you in any way I can.

It's so against the philosophy of everything that entrepreneurism stands for that I don't know how anyone who agrees with it can honestly call themselves and entrepreneur.

In the rest of the world, an ad hominem attack means you've instantly lost the debate.Further evidence of the OP's point, I believe.And if "liberalism" is such a great political philosophy, why do they get so offended by being called "liberal", or bend over backwards in denying it (Dan Blather comes to mind).

My father grew up in the depression era and so had the philosophy that you did not deserve to have something unless you could pay cash for it.

An agent who does not completely buy into the investor's philosophy will not be very good at negotiating with potential buyers.3.

As far as neighborhood- also I have diffenrent philosophy--specially in Atlanta market -- no offense- but I stay away from low income --black neighborhood--- also opposed to Section 8 tenants - I prefer to buy in good neighbor hood--with only few rentals in a subdivision --that way --my tenant maintiansproeprty well as per neighborhood- and appreciation is much higher-- and they treat house like they own or would like to own.I never had problem in 18 years-- Sorry to disagree --but yeah todays market may be different --I am not buying any rentals anymore.

Another philosophy that I have is that I never want to see the house, deal with a tenant or have to show the property.

A lot of it is common knowledge type stuff we just forget to implement in our lives but when its all said and done I really enjoyed the seminar and his philosophy on life.

I'll forgo the fact that there's 5 times the history of data in actuarial science as there is in the data used to make these global warming claims and ask if this is the same liberal fly that supported Obama-care which supports the philosophy of "covering a pre-existing condition", the most stupid, blatant, uninformed, nonsense assault on one of the most basic principles of actuarial science that any private or public executive has ever perpetrated?