There's nothing ethically wrong if the seller/selling agent says that there was an offer for $xxx and it was turned down by the seller.

Postman goes to deliver the mail, they will either pull it out and trash it or they may just pile everything on top (depends on their work ethic).

I would say if you tow them because they pay late, that must be some sort of legal or ethical violation.

Their mortgage payments will be paid directly to the lender each month in a timely matter, ensuring that our investment is secure and safe while protecting the seller future profits and paying down the principle putting more into the sellers pocket.Knowing that we are helping the sellers credit score and they won’t have to suffer as a result unable to make those payments.

I’ve head that but never got it fully and also my Principle and interest from line of credit isn’t $600 it’s like $150.

. - I think the problematic part of the argument that government should not allow anyone to build in those areas is that it is too broad of a blanket policy and if the same principle is applied equally to other areas of the state and country, there will be many places that you will want to apply those restrictions to.  

I have never attended a RE training seminar but I have read enough on BP to distill a few cautionary principles to keep in mind :1.

You could park that money in the stock market and live off the dividends of 80K a year using the 4% rule, and watch your investment grow in value while you live off the dividends, never touching the principle.

The key is simply act ethically and professionally in everything you do, disclose anything that needs to be disclosed, and hold yourself to a higher standard than even the public would hold you to, and you will be fine. 

If you gain advantage by letting an agent double-end a deal, then that agent is not being ethical.