This distinction can allow a manager to have full control as opposed to it's owners.

No where in the SAFE Act is thgere any distinction of real or personal property, if the dwelling or any lot which is intended to be used for residential purposes is secured by the financing provided, it comes under the influences of the SAFE Act.

Again, absolutely nothing wrong with that, but the distinction is very important in the professional world...

We have thought about this and we figured it wouldn't be a problem since there are two separate and distinct legal entities.

But the bigger reason is that we want to ensure that buyer's agents call us and let us know BEFORE they show the property (our listing asks for 30 minutes notice so we can turn off the alarm).This gives us time to send one of our employees over to the property to turn on the lights, open the blinds, verify the temperature, refill the scented air-fresheners, make sure there are flyers and blank contracts on the counter, make sure there is no trash in the yard, etc.I would virtually guarantee you that we get many more offers (and higher offers) because of this than any other single thing we do.

Perhaps I can add some perspective to the debate since this topic has influenced my education distinctly throughout my life.

Nevada doesn't make any distinctions about the number of transactions to be considered a dealer, and their title transfer forms specifically require the dealer's license number.

Apparently they make no distinction between fame and infamy.

But some users here on BP have been guilty of interchanging those two words despite their having such distinct meaning.Sure, we can read the posts here on the forum, and we can figure out the intentions of a piece of gibberish.

I wouldn't (don't) do it unless there's distinctly more rent.