You can't become licensed if you have been convicted of any crimes of moral turpitude.

You as a broker/agent are required to disclose exactly what you said, if the seller accepts it and it's in writing they have no recourse regarding that because you went about it ethically and morally.

From a moral perspective, it's completely misleading. 

Putting in new appliances kinda cost me (see my other post titled Moral Question).  

This article seems to explain what they did and it seems to ride the line of legal/moral. http://www.creonline.com/beat-the-due-on-sale-clau...However, this was not made clear to us and again we were told that the mortgage would be out of our name within 4 months not 4 years.  

If you can do that morally, AND legally, great.

So the moral of the story is that keeping money is just as hard as making it.

So I guess the moral of the story is the bigger you get the harder it can be to trade up, especially when the whole world is chasing yield. 

@Jacob Wright You said "The home sold for $175k in 2005 and is selling for the same amount now due to the owner moving out of state".The moral of this story is: NEVER take it for granted that the stated reasons for selling are giving you the whole story!

I looked at a place in Pittsburgh decent neighborhood seemed to be a pretty good wholesale deal listed at 29900 from pic's when I got there probably a few squatters living there at the time destroyed a lot mostly cosm...