data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/136b2/136b2347fd08961dc4d04c2fc0fa3c14fe444f9f" alt=""
2 February 2025 | 7 replies
Preferably low or no money down as best seller would be one only interested in the monthly incomeI then sell said first property and take that cash to buy the investment I am really wanting and I get the terms I want.only thing I don’t know about yet is, how to dodge the tax on the sale of the initial property?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3df5f/3df5fa5d678181f9f723a4f56551afa5f13e832b" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 40 replies
Thats $7700 a year NOT including my accountant/Tax prep.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3da67/3da67dd93c29d2a0538109ba4004f1d73e012e76" alt=""
7 January 2025 | 27 replies
Quote from @Michael Smythe: Besides MANY self-labeled "gurus" exaggerating their success, many of them just supply readily available info.If you're too busy to find the info and are willing to pay for it, no problem as you accept their time vs money solution.REGARDING S8 GURU ISSUES SPECIFICALLYMost of them don't share all the facts about how Section 8 actually works.They claim you can get HIGHER rent from S8 tenants vs private-paying tenants.Why would the government allow our tax dollars to be spent this way?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1ac8/a1ac8dfdace4940edfe26c097534e467820112ad" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 18 replies
Someone can be a brilliant tax person but horrible to work with, and also vice versa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be345/be345dd6c6a0cba3b3af00be1f71da64478d1d12" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 2 replies
The property was rented and generated $160 cash flow after mortgage, taxes, insurance and property management fees were paid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51845/51845e6afecda212b6fa66562b0ec9ea3144f371" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 3 replies
Britt,My firm has evaluated some smaller properties (under $500k) in the past for cost segregation, and it generally does not cost justify moving forward, since the benefits are small, and typically the tax liability on the income is minimal if any.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/badec/badece06b81974223f84b87c9f15ef39b601c381" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 0 replies
How does this look from a tax perspective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1f17/f1f17fb840255e231d65b12d4e219de2ebd7faea" alt=""
29 January 2025 | 10 replies
Lower property taxes, affordable housing compared to LA (CA buyers are usually cash buyers because what they net from their smaller home in CA can get them a bigger home here, often covered by what they net from their CA sale), allergies (smog), and politics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dc3e/1dc3e5753d8bc2fa122da07cad912b145356f3d6" alt=""
24 January 2025 | 17 replies
Note the property tax will be -10% on the rent by itself.Month 0 to 24: $2450 * 0.5 - $1573 =-$348/monthMonth 24 to 60: $2450 * 0.5 - $1541 =-$316/monthNext issue is due to the low leverage starting at month 24, the ROI takes a beating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2718/a27180b4dbd3697b6d20ab596f72da51c592f1c5" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 23 replies
That's 50k a year gone and you are losing tax write-offs and equity potential.