It may result in some complaint, but the increased rent reflects increased risk to the LL.MANY/Most politicians do not understand the economic consequences of their actions.  

The politicians are in the pocket of the corporations, so they are paid off too.

If the legislature does not figure out some clever way to "extend it without extending it" (which they probably will), because this will create bad PR for their "downtrodden" tenant constituents (many of whom have collected stimulus money, buffed up unemployment, and other public assistance for MONTHS and ignored their rent obligations with no consequences), I am sure the politicians will find some way to drag out all the eviction hearings. 

Don't get me wrong..I love Austin but its ironic when the city politicians say we want more affordable housing and then have strong restrictions on limiting building in neighborhoods. 

Search Twitter Trends for 'eviction' and see half the politicians demanding an extension. 

Essentially, he sums up the likely idea that a wave of tenants/non-homeowners will complain and drive politicians on the issue of rental affordability.

A politician purchased the lot and hung up on my Realtor when he called about purchasing the lot.

I came across an article where several politicians were unhappy with the CDC ruling since there were loopholes left and the biggest one is that it does not say you cannot terminate tenancy at the end of the lease. 

Makes it easy for politicians to cover doing nothing by blaming rich people.Worked great in pre-war Germany by blaming a certain religious group for the problems of the general population.Sad how it speaks to the average IQ of people.Since Ds own Congress and the Presidency, I'd think it'd be prime to shove stuff like that thru. 

Likely it’s the future generations who will feel the negative impacts of the decisions made by today’s politicians and be responsible for paying off this insurmountable debt.