In essence, they hand-hold you through on how to do two things:  First, find and tie up a select vacant commercial property, then Second get a prospective tenant who would agree to move into that subject property at a future date. 

Also, the fees plus being a forced buyer with a deadline on a 1031 exchange may negate the small tax savings.

Your potential buyer suggesting you terminate the contract and them paying you a fee does sounds fishy to me.

Judges also postpone sale dates for buyers with financing, so cash is likely not necessary to get the date moved.

Do what you say you're going to do, on the seller side and your buyer side.I've done acquisitions for a few years now and I understand how to analyze and close deals pretty good along with having a fully operational running business (from TC, dispositions, etc.) to handle new contracts and get these contracts to the closing table. 

@Collin Luckett what your touching on for changing of buyer during pending is not a viable direction. 

@Geovanni Cano sellers don't like FHA, it is meant for people with little money and very low credit score, plus you have an FHA inspection which can derail a deal a week before closing, nothing the buyer can do.

Most land buyers who are developers usually stick to a very predefined region within their local market and they hunt and wait for killer deals and market swings to get the land they want for the very specific purpose they want.

Everything is as promised if not better.There's a little bit issue on the final day but not entirely their mistake.Problem with all these previous negative feedback is always when buyer/seller doesn't know what they're doing. 

Each potential buyer has come to their own conclusion that it would be too much hassle and risk to manage in this fashion vs a traditional rental even though the average cap rate in our area has been half that at best.