I'd also insert something that constitutes the shed your property if not removed by end of lease.

So, selling a property from your IRA to a company that's 51% controlled by your son would constitute a prohibited transaction.

This is just the beginning of the complete stomping the Constitution is going to get in the next 2 years.

.-- Stricter enforcement of existing codes -- as in five boards piled in a yard can constitute 'construction debris' and result in a fine...-- A majority view that all landlords are evil and greedy...And I could go on!

I went on the IRS website and read the Publication 527.I want to know if a Gift Card bought at Home Depot and is given to a tenant for home repairs would that constitute as a repair expense?

I cannot see how the fed will let them have complete freedom to issue their own currency, as originally intended in the constitution.

I also find the reasoning, that embraces the US Constitution (who's writer filed for bankruptcy) for its message and leadership--yet will reject everything that comes out of EWI (without having perused it first--just because the founder filed for bankruptcy)--to be duplicitous.

The commission of a single act by such a person or entity required to be licensed or registered under this Chapter and not so licensed or registered shall constitute a violation of the provisions of this Chapter.§1445: UNLICENSED PERSONS CANNOT RECOVER BROKERAGE CHARGESNo action or suit shall be instituted, nor recovery be had, in any court of this state by any person for compensation for any act done or service rendered, the doing or rendering of which is prohibited under the provision of this Chapter to other licensed brokers or licensed salespersons unless such person was duly licensed under this Chapter as a broker or salesperson prior to the time of offering to perform any such act or service or procuring any promise to contract for the payment of compensation for any such contemplated act of service

I was brought up with Constitutional rights.

Most disturbing to me is the apparent unconstitutionality of San Francisco dictating changes in existing leases.Article I, section 10, clause 1 of the United States Constitution specifically states that “No State shall … pass any Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts.†But hey, this must be the "Change We Can Believe In".