That seems like the next logical step or at least one of the next steps.

It seems like a logical extension of the idea to pay rent to the property LLC for the space I inhabit - even though I hadn't consider that further rental income as well.I haven't had time to process DSCR, but I will certainly do so.

I have been pondering it and can't make any of my logic apply - the apparent actions seem to serve no purpose that I can think of.posted by @John Moore: You did not mention if you contacted her to purchase the property only that you became aware of who owned it.

Nonetheless I am always looking for a deal, but this seems the most logical and attractive at my beginner investing level.Thanks again!

ed maximum commission.So to me it is speaking to the requirements of the listing agent/Broker in the first two sections so the logical conclusion is that the third is probably similar and is in dealing with the requirements as a result of contact made while acting as a real estate agent.

I'm not sure your logic there is valid.

Respectfully, I don't understand the logic of resisting a $500 homeowner's policy to cover an $80,000 home.

Two points in particular that resonate with me are @Ellis San Jose "opportunity cost" and @Jerry W. logic of the 12% existing cap rate versus losing money at anything below 13%.

Good EveningI purchased my first list on listsource (A Core Logic Company) just a few moments ago.

It's also based on a tax system that doesn't handle gambling income in a very logical way.Technically, you are supposed to report all of your gambling wins/losses on your taxes.