If it is still owned by a person it will describe the grantor and the grantee.

First things first I am not a lawyer and I cannot give you legal advice but it sounds to me like your describing a buyer broker agreement which is standard practice up where I'm at.

You learned your lesson.She is brave to push you like that when you have more power in this relationship in the long run.Put some sod in, do the math on that.Even if it is only a small patch of sod, it could meet the definition described in the email.  

I've kept worse tenants than you describe just to reduce my hassle factor, especially during the holidays.  

The other thing that was described with the question of why the Banksters won't budge on the Price of their REO's in a Strong Market?

In the circumstance you described I believe you stated the second party was originally on the title but not on mortgage later removed then reinstated, which I'm not certain would constitute unjust enrichment, but I'm certain a legal professional would clarify that for you....

John Kunick a house hack is just the term I've heard used to describe purchasing a 2-3-4 plex and living in one unit while renting the others.

Um NO,  I'm describing MARKET VALUE. 

After all, are we landlords really the benevolent people you describe as "providing housing," as if we consciously prioritize the service over the profit?

AirBnB's ability to link listings made things a lot easier for me as I also split listings in the way you described but before that I was using Ownerrez to take care of it, which I still use and think is a really good channel manager.