
16 November 2010 | 26 replies
Again, absolutely nothing wrong with that, but the distinction is very important in the professional world...

28 November 2010 | 9 replies
We have thought about this and we figured it wouldn't be a problem since there are two separate and distinct legal entities.

19 August 2010 | 61 replies
Perhaps I can add some perspective to the debate since this topic has influenced my education distinctly throughout my life.

18 August 2010 | 2 replies
Nevada doesn't make any distinctions about the number of transactions to be considered a dealer, and their title transfer forms specifically require the dealer's license number.

23 December 2009 | 50 replies
Apparently they make no distinction between fame and infamy.

17 February 2010 | 31 replies
But some users here on BP have been guilty of interchanging those two words despite their having such distinct meaning.Sure, we can read the posts here on the forum, and we can figure out the intentions of a piece of gibberish.

2 February 2010 | 10 replies
I wouldn't (don't) do it unless there's distinctly more rent.

14 June 2010 | 21 replies
Now, let make a distinction between being your own contractor and do the work yourself.

11 February 2010 | 15 replies
They seem to be more flexible after the auction when the property is assigned to representing firm (Such as Hook Van Holms and others) but even then, they work by a stringent guideline.

27 April 2010 | 48 replies
You have to distinct between fraudulent act against borrower and fraudulent act against investors.