If you’re not factoring in asset management fees and investor returns when calculating ROI, then what seems like a good investment may not be scalable at all.For anyone looking to scale, start by asking yourself: Can my process generate returns that cover passive investors, management expenses, and still leave me with a worthwhile profit? 

To who this may concern,To discuss any matter in depthYou can reach me directly at my email on my profile page(biggerpockets wouldn't allow me to comment with my email here).

For example, I am a little concerned about some aspects of the business cycle recovery and a potential for a double-dip so I lean toward the safest part of capital stack which is debt (or low-debt equity).

Don't leave out tax liability. 

My tenants have no incentive to leave because rent would be much more expensive if they move out and go somewhere else.

Our biggest climate risks in central Texas are typically wind and hail, so anything of concern regarding the roof could get an applicant declined including trees too close to the roof surface, roof over 10 years old, etc.

I know not typical on here to have such a little amount in loans but we enjoy great cash flow that we live on, have lots of flexibility in what we can do and have no concern about making payments if the economy were to take a dump.

I'm not saying the list is ridiculous,  because all safety concerns should be addressed.

He locked in a deal that would later bring in a $40,000-$50,000 assignment fee.Here’s the kicker: as Dylan was leaving, another investor pulled up to meet the seller—just minutes too late.

I have not been concerned about negative cash flowing due to gaining so much equity.