Logically, we should each pay half the mortgage ($1050/mo), utilities, etc and then split the profit after the TH is sold.

They made me scared too and I acted with emotion instead of logic.

If I had a tiny kitchen, I'd put effort into building that up - kitchens are where people spand a ton of time, and they do choose houses based on the kitchen.I have no official stats, but this seems logical, NO?

By that, I mean, I'll see properties that are great deals, but cost $1 million or so - anyone who looks at the deal should be able to see that it is worthwhile.I know that logically, the banks should give a loan out for these properties because they too will see the value and income.

I believe in the principle: “for two investments of equal risk, a logical investor will chose the one with the higher return.”

People base their decisions on emotions then later justify their decision based on logic.

For myself I can not think of a logical reason for not investing.Oh well maybe It's I have no money!

I know some sellers are not in a position to invest that 10% (financially, or because of their time or expertise), but still...I guess my point/question here is - does the above logic seem correct?

Seems the logical easy way to do it, or is there a reason to tile after the cabines are in?

Most if not all major metro cities are growing including the areas around them (within logical commuting range).