What I presented - and BTW, it's not my idea but one that's used by wealthy people & corporations all over the world - allows him to access the equity he's accumulated in the properties in lump sums which more than offsets the cost of the PM, and continue to own the asset such that it can be continued in virtual perpetuity.

They are your stereotypical ‘salesman’ type brokers, more about just selling any and all homes than they are studying the markets.

I of course want to avoid this, and was wondering the best method/ information i needed to avoid this stereotype.

My own ceiling fan is perpetually on in my office where I spend most of my time, so I can understand.

What the law does do is create tenants in perpetuity which means I can't decide I don't want to continue to rent to a tenant who has lived in the property for over 12 months and tell them to move at the end of their lease.

I want he family to be able to enjoy these in perpetuity and that cannot happen as a MTR or LTR.Best wishes. 

@JJ WilliamsI am not a fan of giving cash flow or equity or anything like that in these scenarios- I would rather pick a fixed rate to borrow on and have them act only as a lenderAs time goes on cash flow will increase over time - do you want to owe them for perpetuity on that asset ?

Or is it more due to the stereotypes around people on Section 8/the other tenants are paying a considerably lower amount every month?

But the converse of that is that a large percentage of females with husbands or male partners will perpetuate the problem by deferring to the husband, and taking a passive role rather than an equal one. 

I had the same apprehension about section 8 that many people might have but my experience has been the opposite of any negative stereotypes.