Not always, but generally the groups that are charging 3%+ acq fees and loan guarantee fees are primarily compensated to transact QUANTITY not quality.

From my perspective, when BRRRR'ing the most important aspect is the quantity of deals you can secure at values below the ARV in a given area.

There are discussions of lowering the permit quantity but nothing definitive yet.  

Shouldn't we be prioritizing quality over quantity?  

Generally, this would be ok if you are building at scale and planning to build high quantity of modules, which would eliminate single family homes or ADUs. 

And to get the #’s most people want, would require more doors (higher quantity), and therefore more time/energy intensive mgt issues.

You should check out the 2020 state ADU legislation, but off the top of my head I recall two ADUs for 2-4 unit properties and a max quantity of attached ADUs equal to 25% of existing units for 5+ units.

we use property preservation companies and they charge anywhere from $20-$50/photo depending on quantity and location.also provide you with a report on the property as well. 

Which is their prerogative I suppose, but when its my salary being spent in such quantity I refuse to let anyone else make those decisions for me.

Quality over quantity.