I don't like seeing a bunch of blue haired nerds running around crying about how evil their landlord's are for forcing them to pay their rent on time, but I don't want being a blue haired nerd to become a criminal offense.

This experience has really made her lose faith in the California justice system, and she's ready to retire (finally!).

Many posters state that the investment was a Ponzi scheme and or the investment was a "rip off" or the sponsors are criminals and their only reasoning is that they were "sold" a return of x and did not receive it or distributions stopped or the terms of their investment was changed.  

While you can have a checklist of income, credit score, criminal background, landlord reference, etc, to me the bigger tell of good versus less than good tenants came from all the interactions prior to leasing.  

I’m sure he’s facing several civil lawsuits right now but I think SEC/criminal investigations should be happening as well. 

Seems like a very strict penalty if this is not followed through.The CTA provides that willfully reporting or attempting to report false or fraudulent beneficial ownership, or willfully failing to report or make updates to the reported data shall be punished with a civil penalty of up to $500/day while the violation continues (up to $10,000) and a criminal penalty of up to two years in prison. 

I recommend trying it for yourself.. pay to analyze a few properties... the first free 5 doesnt do any justice until you get used to using it. 

Talk about un-justice!

Department of Justice (DOJ) agrees that sellers shouldn't set the buyer's agent's pay.

The department of justice filed a request to eliminate the comp agreement requirement due to possible anti trust violations.