This is definitely making me rethink if it's a worthwhile gamble (especially considering the owner that is bey foreclosed on is supposedly a lawyer).

Of course, you could also gamble that the tenant won't show up in court and you get a default judgment.

Potential residents can tell if the owner/operator authentically cares about providing that A+ experience, and they will vote with their wallet regarding where they stay.So going back to my original sentence, here is where my grace runs out.

There are others that continue to gamble with floating rate debt.  

Those in earthquake zones who INTENTIONALLY don't have the readily offered coverages for such, ARE THEIVES by NOT insuring with expectation of DEFRAUDING the rest of us to pay for there gamble. 

If they confirm that it's an isolated event, I'd also recommend enabling multi-factor authentication on your account moving forward.

It’s a gamble, but just looking for ideas from more seasoned real estate minds.

In my opinion investors buy properties with break even or negative cash flow and hope for large appreciation are taking a gamble.

So a realtor is a big gamble at that point. 

Gambling addiction,drug addiction, seems familiar.