No where in the SAFE Act is thgere any distinction of real or personal property, if the dwelling or any lot which is intended to be used for residential purposes is secured by the financing provided, it comes under the influences of the SAFE Act.

Again, absolutely nothing wrong with that, but the distinction is very important in the professional world...

We have thought about this and we figured it wouldn't be a problem since there are two separate and distinct legal entities.

Perhaps I can add some perspective to the debate since this topic has influenced my education distinctly throughout my life.

Nevada doesn't make any distinctions about the number of transactions to be considered a dealer, and their title transfer forms specifically require the dealer's license number.

Apparently they make no distinction between fame and infamy.

But some users here on BP have been guilty of interchanging those two words despite their having such distinct meaning.Sure, we can read the posts here on the forum, and we can figure out the intentions of a piece of gibberish.

I wouldn't (don't) do it unless there's distinctly more rent.

Now, let make a distinction between being your own contractor and do the work yourself.

You have to distinct between fraudulent act against borrower and fraudulent act against investors.