Slaven,The only way to evaluate if you are paying too much for the coverage is to shop it.  

I think this is actually good for buyers, but will likely result in lower commissions for agents, I think in some ways the biggest change is the fact that buyer agreements have to be signed day one, that will do a few things open up a conversation about commissions and what a buyer wants to pay (keep in mind the buyer can still ask to have thr seller pay a buyers agent much like asking for closing costs assistance) but in that upfront conversation thier will be a negotiation about how much is to be paid, what services will be provided etc. and I believe both that sellers will potentially talk to a few different agents & even if they don’t the threat of that will lead buyers agents to negotiate, the media coverage of this will also drive seller awareness of the ability to negotiate.

Login, place coverage and have one monthly billing.

When the LLC takes title you both might not have coverage.

@Jolene Blackbourn go Google Consumers Reports, which pretty much advises against all retail warranties.Majority are setup to string you along and wear you out, so you have the work done, which then negates their coverage.

Can you carve out coverages wanted?

We're talking with someone who may be coming into our company's leadership that will require health coverage.

Hey @Errol Graham, Checkout my asset protection tier list for an overview of what we recommend to clients: Worst: – No coverage, held in your name.

Option 1 involves playing it safe by keeping properties in your name and focusing on robust insurance coverage, sacrificing some LLC liability benefits.

I am limited in STR expertise to my particular location, so I wouldn’t try to give you insight on the specifies of their impact outside of my coverage area.