So with all of this in mind, I see no point to your original post.And are pointing this out because your channel has 85,000 subscribers?

People follow those who have unique takes and are original.

I would be using hard money lending (I've heard it's around 10% with a 1% origination fee) .  

Originally posted by @Justin Stamper:@Jay Hinrichs hey brother!

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

Because the original value of your closed loan was based on renovations being done, there is no additional value to use for the removal of the PMI.Maybe consider refi to another lender who will order another AVM or appraisal to get you a more desirable LTV. 

Our original plan was to work directly with corporations in a more B2B way as well.

I’m being a bit uncharitable here, but they backed off of their original plan, stayed silent for two months, and then quietly passed a regulation stating four or more unrelated occupants can’t live together.

They end up dumping more money into a sinking deal in hopes they can save their original investment.I think it's important to look at the quality of the syndicator.

So, back to the original question of what if you just found natural buyers for homes?