As mentioned above, the builder is just going to complete any necessary corrective work as part of their pre-close punchlist.Here is an exact quote from one of my builders (49-unit townhome project) from a couple of weeks ago on the topic of third-party inspections:"•We will solve items that fall under the category of our Fit and Finish Warranty or any life-safety issues •Cosmetic or "recommended" items from the inspector may not be considered and are subject to Builder review and discretion."

HOWEVER if you are Trying to ACQUIRE the property and the borrower on the Note is now deceased - the ONE Big question (among others) is How do you get marketable and insurable TITLE Transferred over to you SUBJECT 2 that existing debt?

Not because they do a bad job, but their focus is to be as objective as possible in a subjective industry.

Either the property owner leased the equipment and the UCC was intended to notify the world that a third party owns it (no, that vendor cannot now or later lien the subject real property) OR the property owner purchased the equipment and that 2022 lien is about to get wiped by the foreclosure of a first priority mortgage.

Develop a subject matter expertise and a strategy.Remember that the rent growth in lower appreciation/high cash flow markets will be lower than a place like SLC.

If you are subject to Fair Housing, then you should print, read, highlight, and learn the policy regarding service animals: https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/PA/documents/HUDAsstAnimalN...3.

@Brian Batista yes, your best chances of finding good title companies in your area that have experience at subject to transactions are through other investors that have done subject to transactions with those title companies in your area. 

Subject-to deals are great. 

On this same subject, what’s been your experience when you compare how Destin West performed vs your other properties here?

Even if only one person is responsible for paying rent, knowing that other occupants aren't financially strained can reduce the risk of rent defaults.Cons:Potential Tenant Pushback: Some applicants may view this requirement as invasive, especially if they believe that non-paying occupants should not be subjected to the same level of scrutiny as the primary leaseholder.