For example, theirs is relatively less maintenance and comps are easier to find.If you're looking to maximize returns, typically SFH and multi family would yield better returns and wouldn't have the risk of HOA fees increasing.

As for other ongoing expenses that will really vary by property age and condition.

If one can determine with relative certainty that today's tax rate is less than expected future tax rate then Roth makes sense.

So, when asking is Austin still a good place to invest, maybe one should add: relative to what other location.  

We’re relatively new to real estate investing but are eager to learn and start building a portfolio.

Why would you buy an out of state property, with all the related risks, when you can get a similar if slightly smaller yield on a completely liquid investment? 

Before I jump into the cash required to operate which isn't given enough attention by most investors there are additional fee related questions a borrower should ask any prospective lender: Are the 3 points inclusive of loan doc prep?

Third, I was reading Small and Mighty (thanks Nathan Gesner) and found myself doing a "Wait a minute..." when he lays out that for B-ish SFHs he wants at least 6-7% rental income (after expenses), 3% appreciation, relative to the house price.

It would be great to hear about any unique experiences that might resonate with the community.It’s fantastic that you’re open to answering architecture-related questions—there’s definitely a need for that kind of expertise here.

In addition to those above-referenced issues related to conversions, the additional unit(s) would require a parking space and enough lot area/gross floor area to meet the requirements in 9-703.