![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/22554/small_1621361923-avatar-kaminoyousha.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 January 2012 | 4 replies
The deed restriction does not prohibit the brother from inheriting.Your problem with this property is the back taxes.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/33791/small_1621366689-avatar-tlm4kidz.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 December 2011 | 9 replies
Go down to the "RESPA'S statutes explained: consumer protections and prohibited practices" section.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/36070/small_1621368918-avatar-lester44.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 February 2012 | 5 replies
A 2 fam cannot be converted to a three without city approval, which is prohibitive at best!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/95271/small_1621416781-avatar-bradfox2.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 February 2012 | 4 replies
That does sound like a prohibited transaction.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/94309/small_1621416737-avatar-champstar2727.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 February 2012 | 5 replies
Many developers in Houston deed restrict their developments to prohibit certain uses which could include MHs.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/86252/small_1621416256-avatar-yuli.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 February 2012 | 21 replies
While you might be constrained to stocks and bonds by your 401k plan at work, other than a relatively few prohibited investments such as insurance and art, I’m not aware of any after tax investments you can make that you can’t also shelter behind a self-directed retirement plan.All of this assumes you don’t need the money soon, say for health reasons, but you didn’t say that.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/99381/small_1695953643-avatar-marisco.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 February 2013 | 22 replies
This looks like my only option, but I have no idea whether this is just a small claims issue, or could end up being a legal battle in order to get compensation, and whether that is going to be prohibitively expensive.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/38432/small_1621389897-avatar-tchandy.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 February 2013 | 4 replies
[b]Barking Dogs: Cochise County has an ordnance prohibiting barking that disturbs the peace.
5 February 2013 | 28 replies
While an ad such as you are proposing might not draw the attention of the SEC or a state securities board, it is in all probability a violation of the prohibition on general solicitation and advertising for private placements.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/53598/small_1621411901-avatar-cweiler321.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 February 2013 | 2 replies
The new requirements are:The buyer is prohibited from selling the property for any sales price for a period of 30 days from the date of the deed.After a 30 day period, and until 90 days from the date of the deed the buyer is further prohibited from selling the property for a sales price greater than 120% of the short sale price.The above restrictions will run with the land and are not personal to the grantee.Can anyone confirm this and/or possibly have a link to a reputable source?