@Stephanie Irto - I am not sure how they are interpreting the payment due date.

believe me I have sat in front of a state regulator on similar issue with my attorney telling me we were right and the regulator saying NOPE.. guess who won. it was not me that one cost me 30k.Or I could have spent another 100k at administrative law court to argue against the state as to my lawyers interpretation vis a vi the state.the reality is if a regulator takes a swing at you .. not many folks are going to be able to stand up to it..

I'm not sure how to interpret that: Stable area where residents don't leave?

If I am interpreting your question correctly, money you borrow that has to be paid back is not taxable income and is not reported on your tax return as income.Capital improvements are not reported as expenses on your tax return and will not lower your cashflow.  

Contractors do not perform as advertised, the city puts a lien on the property because the borrower stopped mowing, taxes become due, the servicer adds an loss mitigation extra step that no one else does because they interpret RESPA differently and want to triple-cover their asses. 

As far as CPA vs. attorney, I generally find that attorneys are more specialized in creating specific structures and interpreting tax law.

I am not one but here are my interpretations. 

This negligence was mostly their incorrect interpretation of VA loan requirements.

If I've interpreted the county's tax website correctly, it was sold in 2011 for $13k.

Recent interpretations have specifically cited that the performance of 1031 will only shelter the closing entity and seller from repercussions in a  firpta withholding situation if the exchanger completes a simultaneous exchange or has received a certificate of withholding.