But option A seems dangerous to property as it seems shifts the ground damaging the foundation and building as mentioned like below>>Designed to prevent the ground from shifting.From the nearest wall of the building this retention wall is at about 15 feet away.At one point i thought of putting some gravel for better water passage but dropped that idea as it cost money and becomes more harder to maintain by tenant or me in futurePlease advise

Like once we found that a tenant moved a gutter downspout, eroded the soil under heat pump pad and caving in enough to shortly damage the heat pump.

A few reasons to replace would be tenant would be paying for heat, lower maintenance costs long term, and no risk of water damage when pipes give out.Good callouts on ceiling but luckily, i dont have any popcorn texturing, thank goodness.

Cleaning fees in my experience should not have a markup- ideally cleaning includes inspection, reporting damage, toiletry and linen service- its a lot to then try to skimp and mark up if you want quality service is tough.Hope this is helpful!

Rotting window frames, unsafe electrical issues, a tub and sink that didn’t drain properly, a promised dishwasher that turned out to be broken and unusable, a driveway with tons of pot holes so deep that they could have easily damaged cars, and much, much more.

I think the middle road of trying to do both gives you the worst outcome (tenants damaging your property, lower price because it’s no longer new construction).Best of luck whichever path you choose.

Trying to avoid the occupant from potentially damaging or trashing the place just to get even .   

The security deposit is for damages , tell them no and start the eviction process

No credit to damage...or to save.

I'd rather have 3 busted potable water lines to one damaged yard sewer line any day of the week.