But I would be circumspect about how I requested the records (need them for personal research project), how the information appeared when disseminated (all indications that it came from the State would be removed), and how I phrased my interactions with property owner's who were identified through use of public records (I'd never mention that the owner's identity or address was obtained from the State or County, only that obtained the information legally at considerable cost).

By Day 20, had an overseas hacker stolen their identity and used it to open multiple credit cards in their name?

All 12 units are identical layouts. 

Race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, ancestry, genetic information, marital status, veteran or active military status, age, familial status (i.e., children), and source of income (i.e., Section 8 voucher)There are two exceptions to age discrimination.  1. 55+ communities are allowed to discriminate against those younger than 55.2.

I assume they are all identical.

Oddly enough, my financials are nearly identical to you.

Compared to a hotel, all of them are a steal.

As a listing agent, I would rather see contingencies removed than an escalation clause if both offers were otherwise identical.

I sure hope that those agents don't disclose the identity of the buyer, as we have a duty of confidentiality as realtors.

Most of them book aren't visiting for disingenuous intentions to steal from the neighbors, Airbnb host, and such.