To mitigate these effects and streamline court processes, the Supreme Court, under Section 116 of the Kentucky Constitution and SCR 1.010, authorizes the Jefferson County Eviction Diversion Pilot Project.

The "out" that I'm giving you is a federal law (superior to any local code under a thing called the constitution- have you ever read it? 

End of story.However, someone falsely telling others they were referred by you would constitute a BP violation (at least in my book) and as such, you should report that user to Josh or a moderator, saving the PM for the evidence.

An individual whose only role with respect to the application is physically handling a completed application form or transmitting a completed form to a lender on behalf of a prospective borrower does not take an application.Factual Scenarios – Examples of Not Taking an ApplicationWe seek HUD’s concurrence that the following activities when performed by a manufactured housing retailer or salesperson would not constitute “taking an application.â€Giving a home buyer access to a kiosk in order to complete an application on-line which goes directly to a funding source.Directing a home buyer to complete a paper application for financing.Assisting a home buyer with general questions regarding the completion of a loan application by clarifying what type of information is necessary for the application or otherwise explaining the qualifications or criteria necessary to obtain a loan product.1Suggesting that a home buyer may have incorrectly completed or neglected to complete parts of the application.Describing the steps that a home buyer would need to take to provide information to be used to determine whether the home buyer qualifies for a loan or otherwise explaining the loan application process.2Transcribing information from the home buyer and directing to funding sources.

I just think the "Tea Party" has a bunch of them this cycle.So wait a minute....the Democrats just blew a historic opportunity of 18 straight months where it was Constitutionally impossible for the Republicans to block, stop or slow down any legislation and they blew it.

I'm extremely limited in my ability with definitions and what constitutes a legal document and all of that, nor do I want to wade too deeply into it.

People can say whatever they want - it's protected by the constitution.

There, it's usually glanced over, it appears to be one one those, "yes, I all ready know that property is important to the city and state, yes, I already know it can't be reproduced, yes, I  know it's scarce, yes I know it is important to the economy and that property rights are mentioned in our abused constitution".

In other words, a hose spicket in an empty room is not a kitchen and a toilet does not constitute a bathroom.

If you were considering buying such a park, what constitutes due diligence?