Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (3,219+)
Vivienne Pina Cash Back at Closing -Short Sale
7 May 2009 | 20 replies
To address your initial question during the short sale process you will be signing one or both of the following:a "Hud anti-flip affidavit/ disclosure" as well as a disclosure/ acknowledgment that you will not be receiving proceeds from the sale.
Ivan Jouikov How is "Subject To" different from Seller Financing?
26 February 2013 | 41 replies
Texas is full of politicians pushing these anti-investor measures.
Patrick D. HR 1728
10 June 2009 | 14 replies
> > I am writing you to encourage you to vote NO on HR 1728, the "Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act".
Tony Tomasek Official BiggerPockets Discussion of House Bill (HR) 1728
20 June 2009 | 54 replies
I am talking Tonight on The anti-creative finance law HR 1728 Thursday at 7 pm CST The call is scheduled from 7 to 8:30 CST.
Cory Bray US BILL TTHAT WILL MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO OWNER FINANCE
22 November 2011 | 2 replies
SAMPLE LETTERS**IF YOU HAVE A REAL ESTATE LICENSE* Dear Senator [name];My name is Vena Jones-Cox and I am a life-long resident of Cincinnati.I am writing you to encourage you to vote NO on HR 1728, the "Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act".While many of the provisions of the act are positive steps toward mortgage reform, the inclusion of private owners in the act (see section 101(3)(e)) will enormously reduce the housing choice of Ohioans and the ability of home owners to sell properties in this already-slow market.As a real estate broker, I have seen several dozen cases in the past year of home sellers and buyers coming to an agreement for an installment sale on a property that the owner desperately needed to sell (often to avoid foreclosure) and the buyer desperately wanted to buy, but could not raise the downpayment needed for conventional financing.In all cases, these sales turned out to be win-win deals for the buyer and seller; the seller was able to get rid of an unwanted property to a buyer who loved it, and the buyer was able to get his new home at an affordable payment and interest rates with none of the usual costs (points, application fees etc) inherent in more conventional mortgage transactions.In Ohio, these transactions are already regulated by state law: a low maximum interest rate is already in place, and both the buyer and seller are protected by other regulations at the state level.In defense of private property rights, owners should be exempted from the burdensome and unnecessary rules that this law foists upon them.
Jim Wineinger Are things getting better in the Mideast?
28 June 2009 | 25 replies
Now, with a stabilizing democracy in Asia within relative eyesight of Iran and pro-democracy American influence in the region that is much stronger than anti-democracy, overt Communist influence - Iran really does stand a much better chance of a Constitutional Revolution that lasts.
Eddie Ziv What is happening to the "Family Value" republicans?
28 January 2010 | 28 replies
Many in the Dem Party are anti-abortion, not pro-abortion (and don't say pro choice, the baby had NO choice).
Adam Anderson The Country Needs To Spend More Money To Keep From Going Bankrupt??? We Are Doomed.
13 August 2009 | 76 replies
It's a fanatical devotion to anti-Bush dogma with no real basis in evidence.
Richard Warren Health Care "Reform"
28 July 2009 | 6 replies
:cool: A view at the numbers…Democrat Health “Reform†By the NumbersJuly 20, 2009—UPDATEDHere is a compiled a list of important numbers relevant to the House Democrats’ 1,018-page “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act:â€114 million—Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group4.7 million—Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage, according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair Christina Romer$818 billion—Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet federal bureaucrats’ standards$1.28 trillion—New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill.6%—Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill’s first three years—representing a debt and tax “time bomb†in the program’s later years that will explode for future generations$88,200—Definition of “low-income†family of four for purposes of health insurance subsidies33—Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends—an increase from an earlier draft53—Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions—also an increase from the discussion draft1,683—Uses of the word “shall,†representing new duties for bureaucrats and mandates on individuals, businesses, and States—and an increase of 306 mandates from the discussion draft$10 billion—Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare fraud; the government-run health plan does not reform the ineffective anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk programs for two decadesZero—Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access to life-saving treatments2017—Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted—a date unchanged by the bill, which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new entitlements for younger Americans$2,500—Promised savings for each American family from health reform, according to then-Senator Obama’s campaign pledge—savings which the Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize, as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs
Shannon Walton Renter and Condo Property
21 August 2009 | 3 replies
They are anti-homeowner.You could also go to the two yahoo groups, hoanet and AZ-CHORE and ask your questions.