Phoenix has a much more diverse economy, and in my opinion would be a better bet for long term investment.

(around $1k)Month-to-month leases.Tenants pay their own utilities.Taxes are $1826 a year(not trying to promote this deal... just posting numbers to get feedback).I have it under contract for $15k.

(I tried to 'tag' the others but that feature is not working right now for me)The people like him or others that chime in here (you can tell by their 'signature lines', as they are not supposed to 'self promote') could all be potentially good fits.

There seems to be a lot of ambiguity surrounding the self-promotion rule and when it justifies the removal of a post.

As pointed out by the prior comments, if the asset does qualify for 1031 tax treatment, it is likely their will be specialty assets that promote the fact that they are 1031 Compliant as their goal is to secure as much exchange money as possible. 

I've gone to few people's pitches but never found a promoter who really understands the missing owner game, just the talk. 

And the data, in some of the specific areas cited in the study, overwhelmingly points to *something* going on, where, say, in a community that is pretty diverse that a bank will somehow wind up making 97% or even 99% of its loans to white people.As to some of the people saying that it’s “poor journalism” (which is kind of funny because a research paper isn’t really journalism) or the study can’t be valid because they didn’t include credit scores, I find that really ironic since it’s the lenders themselves that don’t want that information made available even for academic purposes.

Even the  Marketplace is an untapped area for promoting Commercial properties.Investors on here are hungry for knowledge, so anything you can provide will surely be followed and consumed by a large audience.

Rational is it promotes additional housing.  

Tailgating is lots of fun and it's a good diversion from what's going on in the RE market.