@J Scott  if he used a CAR form there probably is a mandatory mediation clause so you cant sue until you go to mediation first its the same with OR and WA standard realtor contracts.. keeps the courts from being all clogged up and gives retired judges something to do.

I’m top of that let’s add another $5000 for court costs to serve into effect into foreclose.

On another note, I would also be bitter if a tenant takes me to court for some BS reason so, i don't get why you let her slide for July's rent??

Plan for the fact that courts are much more liberal these days when it comes to allowing trustees to deviate from administrative directions in the trust due to unanticipated changes in circumstances.7.

A court in a jurisdiction that doesn’t have Series LLCs could in theory ignore the legal separation between the cells, right?

The thing is, the owners mother originally owned the property and passed away, so the owner took the death certificate to the court and the judge dismissed the fees, supposedly.

At least that’s how it’s always been handled in eviction court to my recollection.This, moving someone else in who wasn’t on the application, shortly after starting the lease, is one of those things that tenants do which (as far as I know) is legal but incredibly frustrating and not a good sign for the future relationship with the tenant since it either means there was a reason they didn’t list that person (e.g. a criminal record or bad credit) or just that they’re already starting out “in bad faith” by hiding something from you.At the very least, if you can get the new resident’s name I would recommend doing a criminal check on them since I think you do have a duty to protect the other tenants in your building by at least doing a simple check of any new occupants.

Our final attempt will be to get the bank to appeal to a court to get the 5.5’ piece of land added to our property.Is this our only recourse?

It appears that the landlord filed a suit in the county housing court over the issue five months later, but the tenant claims to have not been notified of this filing. 

Bottom line (for me): Unless someone has found a lawyer who has found some precedent of a court case with a real estate investor sending direct mail and that being ok, I see no wiggle room in the SC law.