You can surely hire a PM for one property, as long as you feel like the costs associated with it align with your bottom line, and cash flow objectives. 

Does anyone have an objection as to why I should continue with these services?  

This year will be the most I have paid for my taxes to be prepared, and the only year where I will be filing with an extension (and added stress).To be fair and objective with my feedback, the upfront consultation process went well.

With the money they raised they bought too little real estate to achieve their investment objectives, have LENT millions to the training company, financed a couple homes (wonder who got those, I can't find where they ever disclosed - but it will come out).

I was soooo obsessed with the gator method and basically for me it was the shiny object syndrome I guess, I went from so obsessed to just completely lost interest in it.

Best regards, This approach is neutral and objective, focusing strictly on the criteria, and avoids discussing any specifics about the applicant’s personal situation.

I wouldn’t subdivide based on your objectives.  1.  

I'm not always opposed to some of these measures, but I am objectively looking at how this will affect investing decisions.I agree, the reclassification of vacation rentals to commercial property is the big issue I'm watching.

We all know about the shiny object syndrome or at least we have heard of it. 

@Matt Weddon, I try not to even think about those types of things UNLESS there is objective documentation or they admit to doing something specific.