@Jay Hinrichs Regarding holding a single note vs a single house: holding a single house means ownership over the property and an ability to maintain more consistent cash flows. Holding a single note means cash flow is determined by the debtor, and in the case of a foreclosure, means several months, a year, or even potentially longer to regain cash flow. This is my understanding at least.
To illustrate my understanding: If I own a single rental property that is rented with positive cash flow, it will remain so pending expenses and vacancy. If a tenant moves out, I find a new tenant and may miss out on a month or two of rent. Large or recurring expenses obviously can eliminate the positive cash flow. Conversely, if I own a single note and the debtor stops paying, I now have to attempt to get the note reperforming which can take months and potentially a significant amount of money. Should I foreclose, I'm looking at another significant expense and still no cash flow. In the end, the foreclosure process could result in zero return on the property for an extended period of time. Moreover, from a liquidity standpoint, I can sell the house at market value which generally appreciates over the long-term. However, for a note, there is no appreciation and I'll likely be required to sell at a discount. In the event I foreclose, I cannot sell the property until the title has been cleared which can create another headache. Overall, the exposure risk of a single rental property seems to be less than that of a single note when investing for cash flow and considering the ability to liquidate the asset.
I understand that this is oversimplified, but my goal is to illustrate the above point. Again, I have not held an investment property or a note, but a single property seems to pose less risk than a single note if both are acquired for the same value. Perhaps I'm missing something, such as the average note offering greater return than the average rental property and hence the higher perceived risk?
Any and all comments are appreciated. Thanks!