Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Yoni R.

Yoni R. has started 23 posts and replied 98 times.

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Ned Carey:

@Yoni R.
        "I wasn't clear about the main issue. The main issue is the obligation of the mortgage is sitting on my personal tax return when in fact it is not my obligation."

OK now I understand what you are saying better. Are they counting the debt against you but not counting the income of the building? I think the answer is still to find another lender. 

They are counting the whole thing against me debt and income, because that is how it appears on Schedule E. When in fact none of it should be counted against me personally. 

I already started working with another lender that said he should be able to work around it. Let’s see…

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Heith Reade:
Quote from @Yoni R.:
Quote from @Heith Reade:
Quote from @Yoni R.:

I am purchasing an SFR under a conventional mortgage. I also currently own (100% ownership) a multifamily building which I have a mortgage on. The building is owned by an LLC not by me personally. Due to me being the sole owner of the LLC there is no need to file a tax return for the LLC so it appears directly on my tax return and not as a K1.

The underwriter for the SFR loan I am getting said that they cannot exclude the multifamily mortgage from my personal return because it appears on schedule E and not as a K1.

This doesn't make any sense to me as it is a a separate entity and the building nor the mortgage is owned by me personally. I even asked the underwrite if I had 99% ownership of the LLC and 1% someone else and I would receive a K1 would it then be excluded. His answer was yes. He even told me it's a stupid technicality but that those are just the guidelines.

Does this make sense or is it just this specific mortgage lender not understanding the guidlines?


 Generally speaking, there are 3 things to look at:

1. Who's name is the property titled in? You said your LLC - Good

2. Who gets the income? You said it flows to your schedule E - not ideal

3. Who makes the payment? Do you have a business account that receives the rent and pays all of the bills including the mortgage? - if the answer is yes you may have a leg to stand on to make the case that at the very least you can offset the mortgage payment meaning it won't be a hit for negative income in your DTI but you also don't get any income benefits from the property; which from what I can tell it's not cash flowing.

Please note, you need at least 12 months of payment history showing the mortgage is being paid from your business account.

Happy to chat if you'd like to discuss further.


There is an operating account for the LLC. Everything goes through there. It is completely separate. The main issue is the underwriter considered the mortgage payment as a personal liability. It is not. It is a non recourse Fannie commercial mortgage signed for by the LLC. I am not personally liable for the mortgage and the only collateral is the building.

I have another commercial property mortgage together with a partner. We receive K1's. In this case the mortgage was not considered a personal liability and did not affect my DTI. That's what is so frustrating. It is just a technicality as both properties are under LLC's and I do not personally own or operate them. All owned by entities.


 Can you show 12 payments made by the business account?


Yes of course I have owned the building for more than 5 years. Everything is operated as an entity through the entities operating account. I have no personal connection or mish-mash with the LLC.

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Heith Reade:
Quote from @Yoni R.:

I am purchasing an SFR under a conventional mortgage. I also currently own (100% ownership) a multifamily building which I have a mortgage on. The building is owned by an LLC not by me personally. Due to me being the sole owner of the LLC there is no need to file a tax return for the LLC so it appears directly on my tax return and not as a K1.

The underwriter for the SFR loan I am getting said that they cannot exclude the multifamily mortgage from my personal return because it appears on schedule E and not as a K1.

This doesn't make any sense to me as it is a a separate entity and the building nor the mortgage is owned by me personally. I even asked the underwrite if I had 99% ownership of the LLC and 1% someone else and I would receive a K1 would it then be excluded. His answer was yes. He even told me it's a stupid technicality but that those are just the guidelines.

Does this make sense or is it just this specific mortgage lender not understanding the guidlines?


 Generally speaking, there are 3 things to look at:

1. Who's name is the property titled in? You said your LLC - Good

2. Who gets the income? You said it flows to your schedule E - not ideal

3. Who makes the payment? Do you have a business account that receives the rent and pays all of the bills including the mortgage? - if the answer is yes you may have a leg to stand on to make the case that at the very least you can offset the mortgage payment meaning it won't be a hit for negative income in your DTI but you also don't get any income benefits from the property; which from what I can tell it's not cash flowing.

Please note, you need at least 12 months of payment history showing the mortgage is being paid from your business account.

Happy to chat if you'd like to discuss further.


There is an operating account for the LLC. Everything goes through there. It is completely separate. The main issue is the underwriter considered the mortgage payment as a personal liability. It is not. It is a non recourse Fannie commercial mortgage signed for by the LLC. I am not personally liable for the mortgage and the only collateral is the building.

I have another commercial property mortgage together with a partner. We receive K1's. In this case the mortgage was not considered a personal liability and did not affect my DTI. That's what is so frustrating. It is just a technicality as both properties are under LLC's and I do not personally own or operate them. All owned by entities.

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Chris Mason:
Quote from @Yoni R.:
Quote from @Ned Carey:

@Yoni R. it is not really weird and it is not a "technicality"  It is the normal way things are taxed and reported in your situation. 

Sadly some lessons are hard to learn. The fact is banks often have standardized rules and those rules don't always seem fair or make sense. When you chose how to be taxed there are often advantages and sometimes disadvantages.  Minimizing your income on your tax return is good for paying less taxes but it is bad for looking like you make enough money to repay a loan. It is a trade off we all deal with. 

Some banks and lenders will look at it differently. If you are not a guarantor for the loan they may not count it. (How did you get a loan your did not personally guarantee? I'd like to get those!) Also if you are showing a loss due to depreciation some loan underwriters will adjust for that. You just have to keep looking for the type of lender that will work with you. 

Generally you want a relationship lender. A lender that gets to know you and your situation and is willing to consider your unique situation. This would usually be a smaller local bank. Big banks tend to be more transactional and box checkers with firm criteria. Good luck.

That’s not exactly right at all. The income would appear on my tax return regardless. Or as a pass through on schedule E or as K1 if it were an LLC with 2 members. The income would appear on my tax return regardless. 

What’s weird is if I were to structure my LLC where I am 99% owner and my holding company (which I also own 100%) is 1% owner then the LLC would issue a K1 to me personally and another K1 to my holding company, which is a pass through, and I would just have two K1’s on my personal tax return constituting of 100% of the property. And what’s funny is that this would be ok with the lender. So ya that’s just a total technicality. 

Second of all the aforementioned loan is a non recourse commercial mortgage and is non recourse meaning I did not personally guarantee it. The asset is the only collateral for the loan. 

According to the above sounds like a complete technicality to me. 

It's not.

The processor or underwriter who told you they would need to see the K-1 stopped there so that you, the customer, could feel that you are right. I'll continue where they left off: 

As soon as the underwriter saw the K-1 showing >25% ownership, they'd ask for those business tax returns, which would have the exact same information on them that your Sch E has now, and you'd be back to square 1. 

The problem here, bottom line, is that the property is not cashflow positive according to what you reported to the IRS. Which tax form you use would not change that. The Schedule E equivalents for S-Corps (including LLCs that elect to be taxed as an S-Corp), C-Corps, trusts, and the rest, all have the same information. 

When a rental property is cashflow positive according to Sch E (or the equivalent), the mortgage is omitted. Or, more precisely, it's subtracted from the gross income along with other expenses (plus the depreciation add-back, etc), and any remaining positive number is included as income (with nothing listed as a debt/liability). Any negative number is included as a debt. 


Thanks for the answer! I wasn't clear about the main issue. The main issue is the obligation of the mortgage is sitting on my personal tax return when in fact it is not my obligation. It is in reality not my obligation it is the LLC's obligation. The mortgage is on the LLC, it is a non recourse commercial mortgage with Fannie and all payments only come out of my LLC's operating account. I personally have no connection to the loan. So due to the underwriter considering it a personal obligation it lowered my DTI and because of that they couldn't approve the mortgage for the SFR.

FYI I have another commercial mortgage together with a partner and we receive K1's. The underwrite did not consider the mortgage a personal obligation. So I guess that is what is weird and I doesn't make sense to me and why I am saying a technicality.

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Ned Carey:

@Yoni R. it is not really weird and it is not a "technicality"  It is the normal way things are taxed and reported in your situation. 

Sadly some lessons are hard to learn. The fact is banks often have standardized rules and those rules don't always seem fair or make sense. When you chose how to be taxed there are often advantages and sometimes disadvantages.  Minimizing your income on your tax return is good for paying less taxes but it is bad for looking like you make enough money to repay a loan. It is a trade off we all deal with. 

Some banks and lenders will look at it differently. If you are not a guarantor for the loan they may not count it. (How did you get a loan your did not personally guarantee? I'd like to get those!) Also if you are showing a loss due to depreciation some loan underwriters will adjust for that. You just have to keep looking for the type of lender that will work with you. 

Generally you want a relationship lender. A lender that gets to know you and your situation and is willing to consider your unique situation. This would usually be a smaller local bank. Big banks tend to be more transactional and box checkers with firm criteria. Good luck.

That’s not exactly right at all. The income would appear on my tax return regardless. Or as a pass through on schedule E or as K1 if it were an LLC with 2 members. The income would appear on my tax return regardless. 

What’s weird is if I were to structure my LLC where I am 99% owner and my holding company (which I also own 100%) is 1% owner then the LLC would issue a K1 to me personally and another K1 to my holding company, which is a pass through, and I would just have two K1’s on my personal tax return constituting of 100% of the property. And what’s funny is that this would be ok with the lender. So ya that’s just a total technicality. 

Second of all the aforementioned loan is a non recourse commercial mortgage and is non recourse meaning I did not personally guarantee it. The asset is the only collateral for the loan. 

According to the above sounds like a complete technicality to me. 

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @Tarik Turner:
Try a different lender, look into a dscr options as well
A DSCR loan is currently 8.1% interest rate. Not going to happen lol…

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22
Quote from @David Kelly:

Just to confirm, the multifamily mortgage does not show up on your personal credit report, correct?  

That is correct. It’s a non recourse commercial mortgage under my LLC. What’s weird is even the underwriter said it’s just a technicality and understood how stupid of a situation it was. 

Post: Got denied for a stupid technicality - Please advise,Really weird

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22

I am purchasing an SFR under a conventional mortgage. I also currently own (100% ownership) a multifamily building which I have a mortgage on. The building is owned by an LLC not by me personally. Due to me being the sole owner of the LLC there is no need to file a tax return for the LLC so it appears directly on my tax return and not as a K1.

The underwriter for the SFR loan I am getting said that they cannot exclude the multifamily mortgage from my personal return because it appears on schedule E and not as a K1.

This doesn't make any sense to me as it is a a separate entity and the building nor the mortgage is owned by me personally. I even asked the underwrite if I had 99% ownership of the LLC and 1% someone else and I would receive a K1 would it then be excluded. His answer was yes. He even told me it's a stupid technicality but that those are just the guidelines.

Does this make sense or is it just this specific mortgage lender not understanding the guidlines?

Post: Commercial Warehouses pros and cons

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22

@Walid M. This helped me immensely. Thank you for taking the time to answer.

Post: Commercial Warehouses pros and cons

Yoni R.
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 100
  • Votes 22

@Ronald Rohde can we set up a time to talk? Just sent you a contact request. Thank you!