Originally posted by @Dan H.:
I agree with the posts that indicate the cash flow is poor for the investment amount.
However, I invest in a poor cash flow, high appreciation market. We typically do BRRRR to get immediate return. I do not understand why it would take you 5 years to get your money back on a Brrrr. Cash flow is only one factor that determines if an RE Investment will be a good investment. Your example does not have any value add. However, how are the appreciation prospects? I have purchased cash neutral properties that due to rent appreciation now have over $1k cash flow a month (that particular property also had close to $100k value add). In addition, every RE that we have has appreciated over $1k/month over the holding period.
In summary, I would not make a purchase decision solely on cash flow unless it was in a different league than you example. You example needs to be evaluated using all sources of return.
Good luck
I believe when @Joe Villeneuve says "negative for over 10 years", he means $800/month cash flow (2700-1900=800) and $100,000 upfront investment, not counting appreciation.
I hold 6 properties, average appreciation per property is $20K/year. It may not be that much from now on though.
With BRRRR, I get about $800-$900/month cash flow with $50,000 out of pocket (So it is 5 years to get the $50,000 back). But I spent may be 200 hours on it. If I buy turn-key property and new construction, I pretty much spend no time on it. So hourly income of buying turn-key property is much higher than BRRRR. Do I evaluate it correctly?