Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Walt Waters

Walt Waters has started 2 posts and replied 15 times.

Post: My $52,996.25 wholesale deal complete!

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Fitzgerald Hall:

The only thing I wasn't happy about was the fact that the guy tried to play me by asking for $75 a pice instead of $50. I immediately said no because 50 was more than fair. He agreed and that was the end of that. 

Thanks for sharing and really glad to hear you've been so successful. This is the part that infuriated me. Besides posting on yelp or Angie's list, is there anyway to let potential future customers to know that these people are unscrupulous?

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Joel Owens:

If you want to do this consistently many times over you need professionals in each category. There is simply not enough time to do everything all the time. You oversee things with a watchful eye instead.  

 I don't want to derail the conversation too much, but at what point would you recommend getting the assistance of a tax professional? 

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

When you do your taxes, you don't include the principle portion of your payments as an expense, you only include the total interest paid, as your tax return is calculating Taxable Income, not Cash Flow.

 I think that's why in the spread sheet it's added on to the cash flow instead of a deduction. In your explanation, I think you left out depreciation as a taxable deduction. Maybe I'm wrong about this also. 

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Ned Carey:

Oh I see now. What I described and the analyzer are both correct. 

The money you spend in paying down principal is not a deductible expense. However in calculating cash flow in the analyzer, principal payments are included. Since you don't get to deduct those principal payments they have to be added back in to the "Cash Flow" to get your taxable income.

 Ned, I understand now... Do you know if tax software such as turbotax have the capability to correctly perform these deductions? I know if I didn't have the spreadsheet, I would have potentially messed up on my tax returns big time. 

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Mike R.:

here is how I think about it

The rent payments made by the tenants are used to pay the entire mortgage payment. But remember that the total mortgage payment includes both the interest portion as well as the principal reduction portion.  So the tenant's payment is paying down the mortgage each month by the amount of the principal portion. That principal portion paid by the tenants is essentially an increase in your equity in the property therefore you add it back. 

  Hope this numeric example helps.  Assume you bought the prop for $100 and  borrowed $80 from the bank to buy it. Your total equity is $20 (100-80) in the first month.  The next month you have to make a payment of $6 which is split between interest of $5 and principal reduction of $1.  So at the end of that month your equity increased  from $20 to $21.  

That said I personally wouldn't buy a property that has financials which say I only make money due to the principal reduction. Too much uncertainty with expenses and it wouldn't take much in the way of surprises to have me lose money.  

 Mike this makes more sense in terms of considering equity. I also agree with Ned that it shouldn't be considered as taxable income. However, the add back is being added to the net taxable income in the spreadsheet. http://www.biggerpockets.com/tools/REIPropertyAnalyzer.xls

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Ned Carey:

The principal add back is not taxable, but it does add to your net worth. 

If you paid $1000 in principal payments on a $100,000 mortgage you only owe $99,000. You have theoretically made $1,000. That is not spendable income it is equity.

Then why is it being added to "cash flow before taxes" to estimate taxable net income on the spreadsheet? http://www.biggerpockets.com/tools/REIPropertyAnal...

Post: Logic behind add back principal payments

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1

Hello everyone, 

Can someone please help me answer this...

This question pertains to line 56, "Add Back: Principle Payments" in the REIpropertyanalyzer.xls. I downloaded the REIpropertyanalyzer.xls from BP and it's been a tremendous help to figuring out which properties are a good deal, or to determine what I need to make as an offer to make the better. This particular part of the calculation is really confusing and I actually found an older attempting an explanation, but it doesn't make any sense either. (https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2011/07/2...). 

What the formula does is subtract the total interest you owe from the annual payments and then add that to your taxable net income. The difference between including this calculation or not will mean that I'm either loosing money or making money each year! 

For example, let's say I take out a 30-yr mortgage for $170,000 with a 5% interest. My monthly payment would be $913 and my annual payment would be $10,951. 

Now, let's say that I determined that my net operating income is $15,369, depreciation at -$5,636. My taxable income would be a loss of -$1218 ($15,369-$10,951-$5,636). 

The "Add Back: Principal Payments" in this scenario is $2,451 ($10,951-(0.05*$170,000)). This would "add back" to the net income loss of -$1,218 to make a net income gain of $1,233. 

Without "add back"                               With "add back"

+$15,369: NOI +$15,369: NOI

-$10,951: Annual debt                           -$10,951: Annual debt

-$5,636: Depreciation                            -$5,636: Depreciation

-$1,218: Net income loss                        +$2,451: "Add back: Principal payments"

                                                               +$1,233: Net income gain

As you see, I'm either loosing money or making money by a large difference and I don't really understand why. Why am I including my debt as part of my income gain?? 

Confused and sorry for the long post. 

Post: Hello from Louisville Kentucky

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Michael Seeker:
Originally posted by @Walt Waters:

Mike: Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I appreciate the time you took in expressing your experiences and opinions. I would point out that you may have overlooked some of my earlier statements regarding what I'm looking for. 1) I'm not looking exclusively at 4-plex, tri and duplex are possible also. 2) When I mentioned that I wasn't interested in seedy neighborhoods, I was serious. I don't consider any 4-plex properties where I have to worry about being caught between the cross hairs of a gun fight. That is a reality of certain parts of Louisville people have to contend with. 3) Took a look at your link, and I didn't see any quad plexes, maybe I'm going blind or dumb (maybe both). What I saw were properties that I had described earlier: multiplexes (4 or lower) in less than desirable neighborhoods or 40+ unit apartment complexes that I'll never afford. 

Hope that clarifies things.  

Sorry I missed the note on your flexibility - being open to smaller unit counts would certainly help with your search.  Not sure why the link didn't work - I double checked it and it worked for me but perhaps it has something to do with cookies.  Here's an alternative link, let me know if this one works:  http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/615-W-Saint-Catherine-St_Louisville_KY_40203_M30498-88981.

I'm with you on not living in or investing in rough parts of town which is why I never even look at anything in the west end.  Everybody has their own definitions for "safe" but for the most part, the "safer" an area is the less you'll find multifamily rentals (or the more costly they will be).

 No worries Mike and thanks for updating your link. I saw the property on a competing site and I have to say it's not for me in terms of neighborhood and the building itself. It's true that finding an ideal situation takes time and as you've already pointed out, especially in a competitive environment. 

Post: Hello from Louisville Kentucky

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1

Mike: Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I appreciate the time you took in expressing your experiences and opinions. I would point out that you may have overlooked some of my earlier statements regarding what I'm looking for. 1) I'm not looking exclusively at 4-plex, tri and duplex are possible also. 2) When I mentioned that I wasn't interested in seedy neighborhoods, I was serious. I don't consider any 4-plex properties where I have to worry about being caught between the cross hairs of a gun fight. That is a reality of certain parts of Louisville people have to contend with. 3) Took a look at your link, and I didn't see any quad plexes, maybe I'm going blind or dumb (maybe both). What I saw were properties that I had described earlier: multiplexes (4 or lower) in less than desirable neighborhoods or 40+ unit apartment complexes that I'll never afford. 

Hope that clarifies things.  

Post: Hello from Louisville Kentucky

Walt WatersPosted
  • Louisville, KY
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 1
Originally posted by @Michael Seeker:
Originally posted by @Walt Waters:
Originally posted by @Joe Fairless:

@Walt Waterswelcome to BP. I'm just up the road from you in Cincinnati. Are you planning on living in one of the units of your 4-plex? 

That's correct Joe. I think living in one unit of a 4-plex would be an ideal situation for me at the moment. I have the cash on hand to put a down-payment on a standard 4-plex building and I can qualify for an FHA loan (to my understanding) since it will be my first home. Unfortunately, there are no 4-plex buildings for sale in the entire city of Louisville! Even if there were, my area of residence would be somewhere near the highlands, st. mathews, downtown (east of floyd street) or Crescent hills. There's just not many options now, I'm afraid.

Hey Walt, welcome to BP and best of luck with your investing in Louisville!  It's a great place to invest in rental property (unless you refer to the BP headline study on best/worst cities to invest in).

If you are looking to get owner occupied, 30 year financing then 4-units is as high as you can go.  I have to disagree with your statement "there are no 4-plex buildings for sale in the entire city of Louisville!".  This just simply isn't true - there are almost always quads for sale...a very very brief search revealed this one for example.  They are out there, you just need to do some digging.

Unfortunately, your search criteria doesn't really line up with the reality of the city so it will be difficult to find what you're looking for. Most 4-plexes that come up for sale are located around the Hikes Point area and constructed in the 60's to 70's or are around UofL and are turn of the century SFR's converted to multis. Multifamily in or near the Highlands will most commonly be 2 units because that's how the style of property in that area is easiest to split up. The 4-plexes tend to be park-side where there are larger turn of the century SFRs that have been converted to quads. Good luck waiting for one of those to pop up...people just don't sell stuff in that area!

These are just generalities, but what you're looking for is an apple in a field of orange trees.  You might be better served to search for apples in a field of apple trees (look for 4-plex properties where they are much more common) or look for oranges in the field of orange trees (look for duplex or triplex in the Highlands).

To add to the challenge, you're trying to buy multifamily property in a very competitive environment.  Good properties that are reasonably priced are not on the market for long which helps fuel your sentiment that "there's just not many options now."

If your goal is to find the perfect 4-plex in the perfect location then you should be prepared to wait a long time.  If you can be more flexible in your parameters (open up to duplex/triplex and/or other areas of town) then you should be able to find something that fits what you're looking for much more quickly.