Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tim Menius

Tim Menius has started 1 posts and replied 5 times.

Post: Rental Property Tax Question

Tim MeniusPosted
  • Developer
  • Biloxi, MS
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 5

David Beard's explanation above is 100% accurate. You should engage a CPA at some point in the future, Your situation, while not at all uncommon gets complicated in the future when you sell the property as the "rental unit" does not enjoy the tax free nature of the "gain on sale of your personal residence". Concerning professional tax help, you should remember this expression:

Q. What costs more than a (seemingly) expensive CPA?
A. A CHEAP and unqualified tax preparer...

Post: Exempt from Depreciation Recovery

Tim MeniusPosted
  • Developer
  • Biloxi, MS
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 5

Bob, As a CPA myself I can assure you that your CPA is correct. It is still 1250 property,but your placing it in service when you did pre-dates the ACRS and MACRS provisions. He is exactly correct. Recapture upon sale evolved as a result of accelerated depreciation provisions introduced by TEFRA 1986. Sell it and pay your 15% in good conscience.

Post: Bank foreclosed on second position before first

Tim MeniusPosted
  • Developer
  • Biloxi, MS
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 5

Not sure if it varies from state to state, but in MS when a creditor forecloses on a subordinate lien the first lienholder MUST be satisfied of record meaning that in order for the second lienholder to foreclose he must have the first released...usually by having the second lienholder payoff the first. In your situation, I would seek local legal counsel because in MS your purchase (at least as you have described it) would do NOTHING to remove the existing first lien. My guess is that since the same party held both the first and second positions, they are prepared to release both liens at your "closing". I would recommend counsel though since you could be buying a property SUBJECT TO an existing paramount lien. Good luck

Post: Loans vs. Property in SDIRAs

Tim MeniusPosted
  • Developer
  • Biloxi, MS
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 5

I am a CPA and the advice you;ve received here is consisitent with my own thinking. I prefer to use my IRA as a lender and keep my R/E outside the IRA. The biggest reason for this was alluded to above. Rarely, will a residential rental property produce taxable INCOME, particularly early on. If R/E is held inside the IRA the depreciation driven loss is of no benefit. Dependes upon the circumstances, but generally it is never advisable to put a "tax shelter" inside a tax deferred IRA. Case by case may be different, but that's my quick take.

Post: GO-Zone Investing- Just the Facts

Tim MeniusPosted
  • Developer
  • Biloxi, MS
  • Posts 15
  • Votes 5

As a residential developer who spent twenty years as a CPA Partner in a large local accounting firm, I rarely post much on the various real estate websites. But, in light of the acts that the GO-Zone tax benefits will be sunsetting at the end of 2009 and I constantly see so much misinformation on such sites relative to the GO-Zone Act, I felt compelled to make this post. I have been contacted by an ever increasing number of “GO-Zone†investors as the end of the GO-Zone Act approaches and most know only enough about the bonus depreciation to get themselves into trouble. I hope that this post is taken as the friendly information intended and not as a sermon of some kind.

DISCLAIMER: While all the information contained below is factually correct, I do not represent any readers of this post concerning their personal income tax situations. Accordingly, this should not be construed as tax advice being provided to anyone. Any reader who seeks to take advantage of the GZA should consult his own tax adviser.

First, the GZA tax provisions are the most beneficial tax incentives for “professional†real estate investors since the real estate world was crushed by TEFRA 1986 when the passive activity rules came in to existence. The principal GZA tax benefit is the investor’s ability to depreciate (write off) 50% of the property’s depreciable basis in the year of the acquisition. This bonus is permissible for all taxpayers, but this is also where many non-tax professionals take a wrong turn. The next paragraph is the most important thing that many investors will ever learn about GZ investing.

Rental real estate is specifically identified in the Tax Code as a “passive activityâ€. The only exception to this rule is if the investor qualifies as a “Real Estate Professional†under the Code. VERY IMPORTANT: What are the qualifications necessary to be deemed a R/E Pro?
• More than half of the taxpayer’s time spent performing personal services during the year MUST be in real estate related activities (including development, construction, acquisition, conversion, rental, management, and brokerage), and:
• At least 750 hours per year must have been spent performing such services.

If a taxpayer meets these conditions, his real estate rental activity is not a passive activity, but instead is defined as a “trade or businessâ€. This is hugely important in the context of the GZA…for two reasons:
• R/E pros are entitled to the full 50% bonus depreciation deduction in the first year without any limitation.
• Unlike passive activities, a trade or business loss creates a Net Operating Loss (“NOL) for tax purposes. This is tremendously significant because for the R/E pro, enough current year bonus depreciation to create a “negative taxable income†(subject to some very minor conditions) will usually result in an NOL. The NOL generated can then be carried back five years or forward indefinitely. An straightforward, simple example of the effects of generating an NOL:
o In 2009, taxpayer acquires $500,000 of GZ property and deducts $250,000 in bonus depreciation. Taxpayer’s taxable income before the GZ bonus is only $150,000, resulting in a current year NOL of $100,000. Accordingly taxpayer has a zero federal income tax liability for 2009.
o Taxpayer elects to “carry back†his $100,000 NOL to tax year 2004 where he had originally reported taxable income of $100,000. Taxpayer files and amended return for 2004. When the NOL is carried back to 2004, his amended 1004 taxable income is zero, so he claims a refund for ALL taxes originally paid for 2004.

There is yet another technicality in the GZA that is rarely ever understood fully by lay persons, but to your CPA, it is hugely beneficial. Unlike most areas of the code where “accelerated depreciation†is involved, the GZ bonus depreciation is NOT subject to Alternative Minimum Tax. Your tax professional can explain the benefits of this treatment to you.

Lastly, the bonus depreciation provisions of the GZA expired at the end of 2008 for most of the Katrina ravaged Gulf Coast. However, it was extended through December 31. 2009 for the three coastal counties in Mississippi and 13 selected parishes in Louisiana. These are counties in which the DHS study indicated that more than 60% of all buildings were either destroyed or substantially damaged by the storm.

In conclusion, the GO-Zone Act affords real estate professionals with previously unheard of tax advantages and the Act is about to expire. While tax benefits will never make a bad deal good, they should always be considered in connection with anyone’s investment decisions. If you decide to invest in GZ property, understand the law, but more importantly, understand your own tax situation and whether or not you will qualify for all of the tax benefits.