Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Trace LeDogge

Trace LeDogge has started 1 posts and replied 4 times.

Yes sir, I think I see that in the Code also. The FSBO scenario where the Seller happens to be a licensed agent is not, seemingly, relevant. I guess if an FSBO seller was an attorney, there would be no compunction for the FSBO seller/attorney to reveal that.

Just seemed like there was an 'uneven playing field' with the agent having more knowledge (perhaps) of the market and the process than the buyer.

Thanks for hanging with the question. There doesn't seem to be any real, demonstrable foul here so ... onward and upward!

Thanks again.

Excellent reference.

"Article 4 ... <snip> ... In selling property they own, or in which they have any interest, Realtors® shall reveal their ownership or interest in writing to the purchaser or the purchaser’s representative."

The exact scenario is that a real estate agent owned a piece of property that he was selling. The purchaser dealt with the real estate agent without knowing that the seller was a real estate agent.

Arguably, the real estate agent enjoyed an advantage due to his education, license, and experience. The purchaser may have behaved differently had the purchaser know the seller was a real estate agent. The purchaser may have secured representation for himself upon learning that the seller was a licensed real estate agent.... or perhaps looked more carefully at the seller's representations.

The Code of Ethics citation above seems to deal with selling as a known agent and revealing an ownership interest. The case at hand seems to be a bit off as the seller is known to have an ownership interest but not known to be a real estate agent.

Again, thank you for the reference. I'll continue to look through it but I can't seem to find the exact situation anywhere.

Best regards.

Thank you very much for the response and the reference. I'll familiarize myself with it.

Best regards.

Greetings-

In Connecticut, if a real estate agent is selling their own property (not on MLS), do they have to notify the potential purchaser that they are a licensed real estate agent? If it not a legal requirement, is it ethically "required"?

The thought is that if two private individuals are discussing a non-agency linked, non-MLS sale and the seller is a licensed real estate agent, should that be disclosed.

Please and thank you.

Trace