@Pete Mathias
@Pete Mathias
Agreed it seems like the biggest risk is someone not fully understanding how the policy works, getting lazy/frustrated, and not following up with the laid out plan.
Most Americans are not financially literate or financially independent. As educated investors we can assume that we would be in the 33% to successfully navigate the complex trenches of WLI and take advantage of the liquidity offering.
@Cliff H.
Your argument doesn’t fundamentally negate the basis of WLI as it has been presented in this thread. It simply states a large majority of WLI policy holders default on their investments for purposes not defined.
Take a look at the stock market today - retail investors flock towards bankrupt companies because it is a “good deal” that sounds like someone who doesn’t understand the premise of intelligent investing in the stock market - similar to those who may not understand how to leverage the 2 for 1 capabilities of a WLI policy.
Leveraging WLI as a primary investment is a terrible idea as you can generate safe reliable returns elsewhere, without having to pay fees.
Leveraging WLI as a place to store excess cash, generating better returns/dividends than a savings account, AND taking a loan out for ANOTHER investment vehicle WHILE retaining your accounts interest/dividends seems like an advantageous setup for someone with the capital and discipline to do so.