Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tessa Counts

Tessa Counts has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Thank you, Bryant. I've done both - the land lawyer was a huge waste of finances and the elected officials deferred back to the planner. Stating we were "evading" the subdivision review process. The response made us feel criminal. I appreciate you responding to me. 

Any advice is appreciated. We've purchased a tract of land that was a portion of a completed subdivision, it is listed as a tract in the subdivision but is excluded under an agricultural covenant. It is producing hay ground, and we would like to preserve as much of that ground a possible to continue to produce hay. However, we would like to build one home for our aging mother and one for ourselves. We have exhausted the use of an agricultural exemption under MCA. The county planner is holding firmly to the belief the only way to achieve our goal is to proceed through the subdivision review process. We fear the requirements of a subdivision, such as roads will not only be extremely costly but also damage some of the hay ground. We want to preserve this ground and merely establish a residence. Are there any other solutions to removing the exemption without being forced into excessive development of the ground? Such as primary residence of an agriculturally based business?